The Constitutional regularity parameter asan instrumento to guarantee human rights in the face of procedural formalities: Jurisprudential and case analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36796/biolex.v17i0.26Keywords:
Constitutional regularity parameter, Due process, Human rights restrictionsAbstract
Constitutional reforms on human rights have been the basis for judges to interpret laws according to the needs of social reality. With the establishment of the constitutional regularity parameter, the doors have been opened for judges to resolve disputes in an increasingly just way, since they are not bound by formal limitations that sometimes do not have a practical purpose or do not benefit the parties on trial. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyze the jurisprudential status that prevails in human rights issues and their restrictions, in order to be able to weigh in which cases a procedural formality constitutes a disproportionate restriction of some constitutionally protected right, using a practical case as an example.
Downloads
References
. Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Caso “La Última Tentación de Cristo” (Olmedo Bustos y otros) vs. Chile. Serie C No. 73. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. 5 de febrero de 2001.
___________ Caso Radilla Pacheco vs. México, Serie C No. 209.
. Excepciones Preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. 23 de noviembre de 2009.
. GARCÍA JARAMILLO, Leonardo, Activismo judicial y dogmática de los márgenes de acción: Una discusión en clave neoconstitucional, Primera edición, México, Instituto de Estudios Constitucionales, 2016
https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/10/4753/9.pdf
. GARCÍA RAMÍREZ, Sergio, El debido proceso. Criterios de la jurisprudencia interamericana, Segunda edición, México, Porrúa, 2014.
. ORTEGA SORIANO, Ricardo A., Los derechos de las niñas y los niños en el derecho internacional, con especial atención al Sistema Interamericano de Protección de los Derechos Humanos, Primera edición, México, 2011.
https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/10/4706/11.pdf
. RAWLS, John, A Theory of Justice, United States of America, Revised edition, Harvard University Press, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
. TAFOYA HERNÁNDEZ, J. Guadalupe (coord.), Elementos para el estudio del juicio de amparo, México, Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación, 2017.
. Semanario Judicial de la Federación y su Gaceta
https://sjf.scjn.gob.mx/sjfsist/Paginas/wfContenido.aspx control=Contenidos/ucNoticia &file=NoticiaHistorica&Info4=Info4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
The licensor may not revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the terms of the license
Under the following terms:
Attribution - You must give proper credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes have been made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in such a way as to suggest that you or your use is supported by the licensor.
NonCommercial - You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
